Monitor your own website for changes

It covers part of that job and not all of it. If a published page is defaced, the wording changes and you get an alert with the before and after. What this is not is an intrusion detection system: it does not inspect your server, your files, or your logs, and it will not tell you how someone got in. Treat it as a check on what the public actually sees, alongside your security tooling rather than instead of it.

Often, and in a way an uptime check cannot. A page that returns a 200 with an empty section, a missing price, or a template that swallowed its content is healthy by every status-code measure and obviously wrong in a diff. Monitor the content rather than the response.

That is the common reason teams start. Anyone with CMS access can change a live page, and the page is usually the only record that it happened. A daily check on the pages that matter turns that into an alert with the old wording preserved.

From Pro upwards. Point us at your domain, we read the sitemap, and you filter it with include and exclude rules, then monitor everything that matches up to your page limit. Most teams get more from a short list of pages that matter than from watching everything.

No. We fetch your pages the same way any browser or search engine crawler does, at a polite rate, identifying ourselves in the user agent. It is ordinary traffic and it respects robots.txt.